Re: proposal: additional error fields
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: additional error fields |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRBhYT2ztQT207-i4zRPzGAugVG-JWt5i5sfQjethv54KA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: additional error fields (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: additional error fields
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2012/5/1 Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>: > On 1 May 2012 13:21, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: >> COLUMN_NAME - contains missing or inaccessible column name or empty string >> CONSTRAINT_NAME - a name of constraint caused error >> CONSTRAINT_SCHEMA - a name of schema where constraint is defined - >> usually same as table schema in PostgreSQL >> SCHEMA_NAME - schema name of table that caused exception >> ROUTINE_NAME, ROUTINE_SCHEMA name and schema of function that caused >> exception - this doesn't mean function where exception was raised >> TABLE_NAME - a name of table that caused exception >> TRIGGER_NAME, TRIGGER_SCHEMA - name and schema of trigger that caused exception > > I'm strongly in favour of this. Certainly, the need to translate an > error into a domain-specific error message within the application is a > common one, and there's currently no well-principled way to do so, > certainly not across locales. yes, this is reason why I wrote this patch. Additional benefit is significantly richer exception data model, that can be used for PL What I'd also like to see, which is > something that I've agitated about in the past without much luck, is > for a new severity level, along the lines of a "severe error". The > idea of this is to make a representation that the error in question is > one that the DBA should reasonably hope to never see. That is quite > distinct from the nature of what usually form the large majority of > errors - routine integrity constraint violations and things like that. > Do you suppose you could incorporate this into your design? I don't understand well, can you explain it. I don't plan to solve more issues in one patch, but it can be inspiration for next work. Regards Pavel > > It would be nice if in addition to this, a domain-specific error > message could be specified within the database, associated with each > constraint, but I suppose that the details of the API would require a > great deal of bike shedding. > > -- > Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: