Re: polymorphic SQL functions has a problem with domains
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: polymorphic SQL functions has a problem with domains |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRBfA3xOvohFYZzNJ1rNCTu4_nmJk3SJqMuaAkyc+r+v3g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: polymorphic SQL functions has a problem with domains (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2014-04-02 17:19 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
That example doesn't say you can't use polymorphic functions with domains.Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> I was informed about impossibility to use a polymorphic functions together
> with domain types
> see
> create domain xx as numeric(15);
> create or replace function g(anyelement, anyelement)
> returns anyelement as
> $$ select $1 + $2 $$
> language sql immutable;
> postgres=# select g(1::xx, 2::xx);
> ERROR: return type mismatch in function declared to return xx
> DETAIL: Actual return type is numeric.
> CONTEXT: SQL function "g" during inlining
It says that this particular polymorphic function definition is wrong:
it is not making sure its result is of the expected data type. I don't
recall right now whether SQL functions will apply an implicit cast on the
result for you, but even if they do, an upcast from numeric to some domain
over numeric wouldn't be implicit.
I though about this issue again, and I am thinking so it is PostgreSQL bug
we can do safe transformation from Parent type -> domain.
and returning result require same transformation (in this case) - so enforcing casting (not only binary casting) should be safe.
Otherwise - CAST(var AS var) should be useful and can helps too.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
Pavel Stehule
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: