Re: Proposal: variant of regclass
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal: variant of regclass |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRBaEX9K-0JLJveQFX7MQnrLr3ztV98TWKh+y5RWrZK6jA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal: variant of regclass (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2013/12/5 Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
On 2013-12-05 11:54:20 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:> 2013/12/5 Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>Uh. How is that going to help applications that upgraded, without having
> We can introduce some assert polymorphic function
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION notnull(any, message text) RETURNS any, that can
> be used for check inside SQL
noticed a pretty obscure notice in the release notes?
this function doesn't replace a "obscure notice in the release notes".
On second hand is better to throw unpractically designed feature early than hold it forever.
If there was not too aversion against GUC, I can say, so for some time GUC can be solution. But it isnot
Regards
Pavel
Pavel
If this were day one, I would agree we should go that way, but today...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: