Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRBHN1ZUFu8ON_yepvuf1TtQDBFAv-ovkOYfYQ+jNChp1A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello > > When I try to look on some multicheck form: > > a) CHECK FUNCTION ALL ON table_name > b) CHECK TRIGGER ALL ON table_name > > then more natural form is @b (for me). Personally, I can live with > one, both or second form, although I prefer CHECK TRIGGER. > I though some time more. if somebody would to check all custom function, then he can write CHECK FUNCTION ALL what about triggers? CHECK TRIGGER ALL but if we don't implement CHECK TRIGGER, then this statement will look like CHECK FUNCTION ALL ON ALL ??? and this is unclean - probably it doesn't mean - check trigger function with any table. So this is other argument for CREATE TRIGGER. Nice a day Pavel > notes? > > Regards > > Pavel > > >> -- >> Robert Haas >> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com >> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >> >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: