Re: PL/pgSQL 2
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRBCnSbRV3HD8zvO6iR-Ad5fKcd-rFEjM3m5fRbPzKfqCg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PL/pgSQL 2
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2014-09-01 16:01 GMT+02:00 Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>:
On 09/01/2014 09:58 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:We would have to define a specific parameter marker, as used by things
>
> It is in ToDo - allow parametrization for COMMANDs.
>
> But this is one point, when I am not sure if we would it. Now -
> situation is very simply. Variables should not be used as table or
> column name. With your proposal, the situation will by much more
> complex, and probably variables should be used in SELECT * FROM x; but
> it can be ambiguous SELECT x FROM table ... so maybe better to don't
> allow it
like JDBC.
SELECT x FROM ?tablename
DROP TABLE ?tablename
or whatever your favourite place-holder syntax is.
It can be solution, but I dislike it .. It increase a language complexity .. vars with or without prefix .. and more, hidden dynamic SQL
Nothing what I like - I have a mental barrier to this concept.
Pavel
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: