Re: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRBB7o0Z8zV9Ex+VAxGtxt7GFi3otbCk0aA_FD76aJe33g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
čt 7. 3. 2019 v 8:03 odesílatel David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> napsal:
On 2/4/19 8:12 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> attached rebased patch
This patch has gone through a few iterations but I don't think there's
any agreement on what it should look like. There's been no code review
that I can see.
I think this should be pushed to PG13 at the least, perhaps returned
with comment or rejected.
This patch is in this moment in this form interesting just for plpgsql_check's users.
I cannot to move forward without this functionality .. I have a promise of review by some people from big company that uses plpgsql_check, but if there is not interest from commiter's side, then it is not time for pushing this patch today.
On second hand, the proposed syntax is same like for autonomous transactions, so I believe, so this patch will come in few years.
Please, wait few week, and then it can be rejected.
Regards
Pavel
Regards,
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: