Re: [HACKERS] psql --batch
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] psql --batch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRB3BVkL_6+WgPWsk2XsPidyFze8rMzP7M6i9T0-iDkWkA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] psql --batch (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] psql --batch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2017-08-28 8:56 GMT+02:00 Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>:
I find myself regurgitating the incantation
psql -qAtX -v ON_ERRORS_STOP=1
quite a bit. It's not ... super friendly.
It strikes me that we could possibly benefit from a 'psql --batch' option.
Thoughts?
The link between -qAtX and "batch" is not that fully obvious, especially the unaligned tuples-only part. If so, why not some -F <tab> as well?
ISTM that the real pain is the "-v ON_ERRORS_STOP=1" which I occasionally encountered as well, the other one letter ones are not too bad. Maybe it would be enough to have a shortcut for this one, say "-B"?
I agree with last sentence. I don't think so -qAtX are expected always, but "-v ON_ERROS_STOP=1" is pretty often.
What do you think about long option "---on-errors-stop" ?
Regards
Pavel
alias?
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: