Re: BUG #14446: make_date with negative year
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #14446: make_date with negative year |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRB1AysgBVtUgT5QHTkvCpjREyCjcou+e6onkPuraheP0Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #14446: make_date with negative year (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14446: make_date with negative year
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
2016-12-05 19:38 GMT+01:00 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>: > Pavel Stehule wrote: > > 2016-12-04 14:40 GMT+01:00 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>: > > > > abelisto@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > with t(x) as (values('1111-11-11 BC'::date)) select > > > make_date(extract(year > > > > from x)::int, extract(month from x)::int, extract(day from x)::int) > from > > > > t; > > > > ERROR: date field value out of range: -1111-11-11 > > So make_date was introduced in 9.4 by commit f901bb50e; this report is > based on 9.5. Do we want to backpatch this change? Since the fix only > changes behavior that currently errors out anyway, we would not be > changing anything that people are relying on. I lean towards > backpatching all the way back to 9.4 myself. > I have not a problem with backpatch - there are a user who see current behave as bug. Regards Pavel > > -- > =C3=81lvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services >
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: