Re: [PATCH] better systemd integration

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: [PATCH] better systemd integration
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRB++J2Fb=94V+8fJ5nruz4pKmE6D+Pr6qpBwaMP1D+kyg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] better systemd integration  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers


2016-01-30 22:38 GMT+01:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>:
On 1/29/16 4:15 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
>
>     >
>     >
>     > You sent only rebased code of previous version. I didn't find additional
>     > checks.
>
>     Oops.  Here is the actual new code.
>
>
> New test is working as expected
>
> I did lot of tests - and this code works perfect in single server mode,
> and with slave hot-standby mode.
>
> It doesn't work with only standby mode

Yeah, I hadn't though of that.  How about this change in addition:

diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
index 2e7f1d7..d983a50 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
@@ -4933,6 +4933,11 @@ sigusr1_handler(SIGNAL_ARGS)
        if (XLogArchivingAlways())
            PgArchPID = pgarch_start();

+#ifdef USE_SYSTEMD
+       if (!EnableHotStandby)
+           sd_notify(0, "READY=1");
+#endif
+
        pmState = PM_RECOVERY;
    }
    if (CheckPostmasterSignal(PMSIGNAL_BEGIN_HOT_STANDBY) &&

> Default timeout on FC is 90 sec - it is should not to be enough for
> large servers with large shared buffers and high checkpoint segments. It
> should be mentioned in service file.

Good point.  I think we should set TimeoutSec=0 in the suggested service file.

probably no other is safe

Pavel
 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] better systemd integration
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review