Re: BUG #9187: corrupt toast tables
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #9187: corrupt toast tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRAufPtTn5+ohFqPbcd1JzkErsCK51UAkHCWd8nt4osXjA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #9187: corrupt toast tables (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hello I have a similar report: 2014-01-17 02:02:45 CET ERROR: missing chunk number 0 for toast value 26127 in pg_toast_20142 2014-01-17 02:02:45 CET STATEMENT: COPY journal.product_journal (product_id, revision, tablename, changes, create_user_id, item_id, created, processed, process_user_id, confirmed) TO stdout; PG 9.2.4 probably related http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/C62EC84B2D3CF847899CCF4B589CCF70B20AA08F@BBMBX.backbone.local Regards Pavel 2014-02-11 22:19 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > kevin.hughes@uk.fujitsu.com writes: > > Sometime between the morning of the 31st of January and the morning of > the > > 3rd of February the database was corrupted. During that period there was > > little or no activity - other than the nightly postgres dump > > > Looking at various logs we found this error: ERROR: unexpected chunk > number > > 110 (expected 106) for toast value 223972 in pg_toast_80768; > > FWIW, this type of error is sometimes due to corruption in the toast > table's index, in which case you can fix it with a REINDEX. I'd try > that before deleting data, anyway. > > Hard to tell what the actual underlying cause is :-(. I do note that > you're running a PG version that's a year or so old. It'd be prudent > to think about updating to 9.2.7 when that comes out next week. > > regards, tom lane > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs >
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: