Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRAtxh9mAGGq-dv=SWQfoSEjdyHZD0g6nvpd0Ki1RT3bLQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Store Extension Options
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2013/12/31 Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I am looking on this patch
>
> ALTER TABLE foo SET (ext.somext.do_replicate=true);
>
> Why is there fixed prefix "ext" ?
>
> This feature is similar to attaching setting to function
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION ... SET var = ...;
>
> We can use someprefix.someguc without problems there.
>
We use the prefix "ext" (aka namespace) to distinguish these options which are related to "extensions".
Have you seen the previous thread [1] ?
yes, but I don't understand why it is necessary? I use a analogy with custom GUC - and there we don't use similar prefix. Only any prefix is required - and it can contain a dot.
Regards
Pavel
Pavel
Regards,
[1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFcNs+rqCq1H5eXW-cvdti6T-xo2STEkhjREx=OdmAkK5tiOOw@mail.gmail.com
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: