Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRAtPbiDTV92CTMhh41w5qZ=pHsWYR7UFEhab43u7XsH-Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
2015-11-05 22:23 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
Thanks, that would be great!On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I wrote some text. But needs some work of native speaker.
>>
>> It does. It would be nice if some kind reviewer could help volunteer
>> to clean that up.
>
> I'll give it a go sometime next week.
I recommend comparing the section on -c and the section on -C, and
probably updating the former as well as adjusting the wording of the
latter. We don't want to repeat all the same details in both places,
but we hopefully want to give people a little clue that if they're
thinking about using -c, they may wish to instead consider -C.
-g was replaced by -C option and some other required changes.
I have not idea about good long name. In this moment I used "multi-command". Can be changed freely.
The name of this patch is same (although it doesn't use "group-command" internally anymore) due better orientation.
Regards
Pavel
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: