Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRAs2P9aQOtQS8Kr2WjLisq9UJxf4AF58fQg0ujzEDoUWA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2016-11-02 15:57 GMT+01:00 Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote:
> SPI support would also
> allow us to consider using set logic for validating foreign keys,
> instead of the one-row-at-a-time approach currently used.
Just as a proof of concept for this I used the attached test case
to create foreign keys using current techniques versus set-oriented
queries with the transition-tsr code. These probably can be
improved, since this is a "first cut" off the top of my head.
The delete of about one million rows from a "parent" table with no
matching rows in the "child" table, and no index on referencing
column in the child table, took 24:17.969 using current triggers
and 00:03.262 using the set-based triggers. Yes, that reduces
current run time for that case by 99.78%
this is great number
Pavel
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: