Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRAnkj68ORyU7d3CtUER4-=c3oD0eU8=OLjA2UFv3orx2A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables (srielau <serge@rielau.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2017-10-31 22:28 GMT+01:00 srielau <serge@rielau.com>:
Pavel,
There is no
DECLARE TEMP CURSOR
or
DECLARE TEMP variable in PLpgSQL
and
sure .. DECLARE TEMP has no sense, I talked about similarity DECLARE and CREATE TEMP
CREATE TEMP TABLE has a different meaning from what I understand you
envision for variables.
But maybe I'm mistaken. Your original post did not describe the entire
syntax:
CREATE [TEMP] VARIABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] name AS type
[ DEFAULT expression ] [[NOT] NULL]
[ ON TRANSACTION END { RESET | DROP } ]
[ { VOLATILE | STABLE } ];
Especially the TEMP is not spelled out and how its presence affects or
doesn't ON TRANSACTION END.
So may be if you elaborate I understand where you are coming from.
TEMP has same functionality (and implementation) like our temp tables - so at session end the temp variables are destroyed, but it can be assigned to transaction.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers- f1928748.html
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: