Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRAkCyO85e_1jYM5RGM6eU7M4F1GiWZafukyB2Pg=Hwnfg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 (Joel Jacobson <joel@trustly.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2014-09-06 15:12 GMT+02:00 Joel Jacobson <joel@trustly.com>:
The above is horrible and ugly. That's not how I write code.On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> People can prepare a simple functions like you did:
>
> ...
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION user_list ()
> RETURNS SETOF id AS $$
> BEGIN
> RETURN QUERY SELECT id FROM user WHERE .. some = $1
> END;
> $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_user(int)
> RETURNS void AS $$
> BEGIN
> UPDATE user SET .. WHERE id = $1
> END;
> $$ LANGUAGE;
>
> And then use it in mass operations:
>
> BEGIN
> FOR company IN SELECT * FROM company_list()
> LOOP
> FOR id IN SELECT * FROM user_list(company)
> LOOP
> update_user(id);
> END LOOP;
>
> Or use it in application same style.
>
> It is safe .. sure, and I accept it. But It is terrible slow.
Only for top-level functions, i.e. API-functions, is it motivated to
encapsulate even simple queries like that, but *never* in other
PL-functions, as that doesn't fulfil any purpose, putting simple
queries inside functions only make it less obvious what the code does
where you have a function call instead of a SQL-query.
It is ugly, but I meet it. Its nothing special.
Pavel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: