Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRAe1PQvfyyHQYRmL7OQDJiPV7OLAFx-1-cQGExw5QK1ug@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf
statements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2013/2/27 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>: > * Pavel Stehule (pavel.stehule@gmail.com) wrote: >> we cannot use autocomplete or if we use, then more precious code is on >> server side still - everywhere where function autocomplete is used, >> then function signature is reparesed again on server side. > > This doesn't make any sense to me. > > We should rip out the auto-complete that we already have for functions > because the tab-complete queries the database and then the whole string > is sent to the server and parsed by it? autocomplete send a SQL query in every iteration to server - so it is not any new overhead. And if we should to write some smarted routine, then I prefer server side due better reusability and better exception processing than psql environment - and a possibility of access to system caches and auxiliary functions for arguments processing. This routine can be smart enough to support autocomplete and unique identification without needless exceptions - and then psql behave can be more smooth and consistent. Regards Pavel > > Thanks, > > Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: