Re: CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS AS
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS AS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRAcV0jbY46gxk-6SKYRpeECWFM0XR8Ju7sTysMKcTB9OA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS AS (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS AS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2013/11/20 Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
On 11/17/2013 08:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:I'm pretty uncomfortable with CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS too - but it
> That's an even worse idea than plain CREATE IF NOT EXISTS (which was
> put in over vocal objections from me and some other people).
doesn't hurt someone who doesn't use it and it does have uses.
We have plenty of other features that can be horribly abused too. That
doesn't mean new ones should be added casually, just that it's sometimes
appropriate to accept something that's imperfect when it meets a need
and we don't have a better way to do it.
It'd be great if there was a sane way to implement "CREATE OR REPLACE
TABLE" - since that's what people really want a lot of the time. "Ensure
that at the end of this command the table looks like this". There's just
no sane way to do that for a non-empty table.
I disagree - CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION has sense, because new function can has same interface (and will be overwriten) or different (and there will be two functions). So with CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE there are two new questions - has to new table respect original interface and what about content? I don't think so CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE is good idea.
Regards
Pavel
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: