Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRAb63Ff3sGtaNn3YfxFjg-17S-0evKdWiDvTMh0C3BdVA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2015-10-22 20:15 GMT+02:00 Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>:
On 10/22/15 2:20 AM, dinesh kumar wrote:
2. Using this function, if we provide any "NULL" argument to the function,
we should either skip it or report it. I see this is what the function
is doing.
postgres=# SELECT pg_report_log('INFO', 'NULL', false, NULL, NULL);
INFO: NULL
postgres=# SELECT pg_report_log('INFO', 'NULL', false, 'NULL', 'NULL');
INFO: NULL
DETAIL: NULL /-- Are you suggesting to change this behaviour/
HINT: NULL
It should operate the same as what was decided for RAISE.
I am sorry, there was more opinions - what was decided for RAISE?
I'd say it should also support the remaining RAISE options as well (COLUMN, CONSTRAINT, DATATYPE, TABLE, SCHEMA).
I think hide_statement is a better name than ishidestmt. It would be nice if RAISE supported that too...
I think the function should also allow specifying a condition name instead of a SQL state, same as RAISE does.
In other words, this function and raise should operate exactly the same unless there's a really strong reason not to. Otherwise it's just going to create confusion.
I have different opinion - if RAISE and this function is exactly same,then the function has not sense. There should not be principal difference, but in same behave I don't see any sense.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: