Re: new unicode table border styles for psql
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: new unicode table border styles for psql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRA_OGhH7zJNqM2qGq5XRymw_NjB8fLrqcEia39T+YAGpA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: new unicode table border styles for psql (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2013/11/28 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Robert Haas escribió:> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:You know what I think would have some value? An output style that emits
> > Now for the linestyles. I can see how some of them are attractive, but
> > several of them have poor aesthetics, I think. I don't see a reason to
> > accept 7 new styles just for fun. If I had to choose, I'd consider
> > -double1 and -double4 to be acceptable.
>
> I'm confused why we need ANY of these. What problem are we solving
> that the existing unicode style doesn't already solve? We could
> doubtless invent an infinite or at least very large number of
> plausible ways to border psql output, but I don't see that as
> something that has value.
DocBook markup for tables, something which we could paste on the docs.
(I already use the LaTeX mode to paste in presentation slides.)
Although it sounds crazy - some unicode-doubleX looks well (although it is subjective) and I use it in presentation (and wiki) too - just copy/paste.
Nothing against DocBook support (or any modern markdown (mediawiki, ..) formats).
Pavel
--Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: