Re: Weird special case in jsonb_concat()
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Weird special case in jsonb_concat() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRAWO2VZAC1D6+Mob2Ysi0FpMpLAn+QE=MpngZpDA2aBXQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Weird special case in jsonb_concat() (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
so 19. 12. 2020 v 21:35 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
I wrote:
> However, further experimentation found a case that fails:
> regression=# select '3'::jsonb || '{}'::jsonb;
> ERROR: invalid concatenation of jsonb objects
> I wonder what is the point of this weird exception, and whether
> whoever devised it can provide a concise explanation of what
> they think the full behavior of "jsonb || jsonb" is. Why isn't
> '[3, {}]' a reasonable result here, if the cases above are OK?
Here is a proposed patch for that. It turns out that the third
else-branch in IteratorConcat() already does the right thing, if
we just remove its restrictive else-condition and let it handle
everything except the two-objects and two-arrays cases. But it
seemed to me that trying to handle both the object || array
and array || object cases in that one else-branch was poorly
thought out: only one line of code can actually be shared, and it
took several extra lines of infrastructure to support the sharing.
So I split those cases into separate else-branches.
This also addresses the inadequate documentation that was the
original complaint.
Thoughts? Should we back-patch this? The existing behavior
seems to me to be inconsistent enough to be arguably a bug,
but we've not had field complaints saying "this should work".
+1
Pavel
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: