Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRANebhmVDaR0gAZzP9DnJpXQnTQgnuUjJ7eR-Ogp_jG0Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello * I refreshed regress tests and appended tests for multi lines query * There are enhanced checking of SELECT INTO statement * I fixed showing details and hints Regards Pavel Stehule 2012/3/5 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>: > Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of lun mar 05 13:02:50 -0300 2012: >> small fix of CheckFunctionById function >> >> Regards >> >> p.s. Alvaro, please, send your patch and I'll merge it > > Here it is, with your changes already merged. I also added back the > new reference doc files which were dropped after the 2012-01-01 version. > Note I haven't touched or read the plpgsql checker code at all (only > some automatic indentation changes IIRC). I haven't verified the > regression tests either. > > FWIW I'm not going to participate in the other thread; neither I am > going to work any more on this patch until the other thread sees some > reasonable conclusion. > > -- > Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> > The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: