Re: proposal: schema variables
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: schema variables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRALAZOu6bXTaz6CHox9S=OqHT-suX+LRgA4z0nzhXv4Vw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: schema variables (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: schema variables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
pá 28. 2. 2020 v 16:30 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> napsal:
čt 27. 2. 2020 v 15:37 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> napsal:Hi
3) Any way to define CONSTANTs ?
We already talked a bit about this subject and also Gilles Darold introduces it in this mailing-list topic but I'd like to insist on it.
I think it would be nice to have a way to say that a variable should not be changed once defined.
Maybe it's hard to implement and can be implemented later, but I just want to know if this concern is open.I played little bit with it and I didn't find any nice solution, but maybe I found the solution. I had ideas about some variants, but almost all time I had a problem with parser's shifts because all potential keywords are not reserved.last variant, but maybe best is using keyword WITHSo the syntax can looks likeCREATE [ TEMP ] VARIABLE varname [ AS ] type [ NOT NULL ] [ DEFAULT expression ] [ WITH [ OPTIONS ] '(' ... ')' ] ]What do you think about this syntax? It doesn't need any new keyword, and it easy to enhance it.CREATE VARIABLE foo AS int DEFAULT 10 WITH OPTIONS ( CONSTANT);After some more thinking and because in other patch I support syntax CREATE TRANSACTION VARIABLE ... I change my opinion and implemented support forsyntax CREATE IMMUTABLE VARIABLE for define constants.
second try to fix pg_dump
Regards
Pavel
See attached patchRegardsPavel?RegardsPavel
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: