Re: gset updated patch
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: gset updated patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRAGY7L=bhUF7t38C4QppzcbFUdaMXdOU+xxv1OEz3oFAA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: gset updated patch ("Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: gset updated patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello 2012/11/16 Karl O. Pinc <kop@meme.com>: > Hi Pavel, > > On 11/16/2012 12:21:11 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> 2012/11/16 Karl O. Pinc <kop@meme.com>: > >> > As long as I'm talking crazy talk, why not >> > abandon psql as a shell language and instead make a >> > pl/pgsql interpreter with readlne() in front >> > of it? Solve all these language-related >> > issues by using an actual programming language. :-) > >> I though about it more time, but I don't thinking so this has a >> sense. >> Actually we cannot do perfect autocomplete for significantly simpler >> SQL and there are lot of client side interprets - is not reason for >> next one. I use psql together bash and it works well. But just very >> simple task as storing some volatile data for repetitive usage is >> relative laborious and it is a motivation for this patch. In psql I >> can simply work with any fields of returned record - what is more >> terrible work outside psql > > You might consider using "do". it is reason, why I don't thinking about plpgsql on client side. But I don't understand how it is related to gset ? I remember, there is one significant limit of DO statement - it cannot return table - so it cannot substitute psql simple scripts. But I don't would open this topic now - it is related to real stored procedures implementation, and it is long time task. So gset allow some simple tasks solve simply Regards Pavel Stehule > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-do.html > > If you need to maintain a single connection you can do > some interesting things with socat to feed a running psql > in the background. > > socat -u UNIX-RECV:/tmp/msock EXEC:psql & > > Followed by lots of > > echo bar | socat -u STDIN UNIX-SENDTO:/tmp/mysock > > \o can be used to send output for pickup, although > you do need to fuss around with the asynchronous nature > of things to be sure you're waiting for output. > I used inotifywait for this. YMMV. > > Regards, > > Karl <kop@meme.com> > Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." > -- Robert A. Heinlein >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: