Re: proposal for 9.5: monitoring lock time for slow queries
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal for 9.5: monitoring lock time for slow queries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRAG6GN8b4=uWLTsHuVCO9jrbyF9iXtdy4FTn1qdhiOLWw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal for 9.5: monitoring lock time for slow queries (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2014-08-18 7:42 GMT+02:00 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>:
> > I didn't mean performance statistics data to be stored in database tables.Is this supposed to be session-local data, or is it visible from remote
> > I just meant:
> >
> > * pg_stat_system_events is a view to show data on memory, which returns
> > one row for each event across the system. This is similar to
> > V$SYSTEM_EVENT in Oracle.
> >
> > * pg_stat_session_events is a view to show data on memory, which returns
> > one row for each event on one session. This is similar to V$SESSION_EVENT
> > in Oracle.
> >
> > * The above views represent the current accumulated data like other
> > pg_stat_xxx views.
> >
> > * EXPLAIN ANALYZE and auto_explain shows all events for one query. The
> > lock waits you are trying to record in the server log is one of the events.
>
> I am little bit sceptic about only memory based structure. Is it this
> concept acceptable for commiters?
sessions too? How durable is it supposed to be? Keep in mind that in
case of a crash, all pgstats data is erased.
surely it should be visible from all sessions and least 48 hours.
I have no problem with cleaning pgstats after crash - it is cost related to minimal overhead. And on server related hw there are (should be) a minimal number of crash.
Regards
Pavel
Pavel
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: