Re: missing support of named convention for procedures
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: missing support of named convention for procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRADMaVC4M6S8Kya=bp0ELDyja6CaqA77xRR5r5R6eUA4A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: missing support of named convention for procedures (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: missing support of named convention for procedures
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2018-03-20 17:31 GMT+01:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>:
On 3/16/18 06:29, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> attached patch fixes it
The fix doesn't seem to work for LANGUAGE SQL procedures. For example:
CREATE PROCEDURE ptest5(a int, b int DEFAULT 0)
LANGUAGE SQL
AS $$
INSERT INTO cp_test VALUES (a, 'foo');
INSERT INTO cp_test VALUES (b, 'bar');
$$;
CALL ptest5(a => 1, b => 2); -- ok
CALL ptest5(b => 3, a => 4); -- ok
CALL ptest5(5);
ERROR: no value found for parameter 2
CONTEXT: SQL function "ptest5" statement 2
CALL ptest5(a => 6);
ERROR: no value found for parameter 2
CONTEXT: SQL function "ptest5" statement 2
I'm not quite sure why this behaves differently from plpgsql. Needs
more digging.
Do you working on this issue? Maybe tomorrow I'll have a time to look there.
Regards
Pavel
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: