Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRAAH5tnQEj8OyikoUGNo-UWFvULquNFs+J6kRFkCZGL0w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2014-08-21 17:00 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> "Heikki" == Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:> Heikki> I think we should bite the bullet and rename the extension,I wonder if you've tried hard enough to avoid reserving the keyword.
> I agree, the contrib/cube patch as posted is purely so we could test
> everything without having to argue over the new name first.
I think that the cube extension is not going to be the only casualty
if "cube" becomes a reserved word --- that seems like a name that
could be in use in lots of applications. ("What do you mean, 9.5
breaks our database for tracking office space?") It would be worth
quite a bit of effort to avoid that.
My prototypes worked without reserved keywords if I remember well
but analyzer is relatively complex
Pavel
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: