Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP)
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRA8WCgTFVtHT1X1nLbCurX0-PqwrZxfrvVwMRni1rKJDA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) (Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rastogi@huawei.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2014-04-07 11:59 GMT+02:00 Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rastogi@huawei.com>:
On 07 April 2014 12:12, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>+1 for feature
Thanks
>-1 for Oracle syntax - it is hardly inconsistent with Postgres
We can discuss and come out with the syntax based on everyone agreement.
>Autonomous transactions should be used everywhere - not only in plpgsql
Yes you are right. I am not planning to support only using plpgsql. Initially we can support this
Using the standalone SQL-commands and then later we can enhance based on this infrastructure
to be used using plpgsql, triggers.
ok
long time I though about this feature.
I am thinking so this should be fully isolated transaction - it should not be subtransaction, because then you can break database consistency - RI
I am happy so someone does this job
Regards
Pavel
Thanks and Regards,
Kumar Rajeev Rastogi
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: