Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRA3DcVSdZ_1TZ6kRuBjDm+rFoxHr=sZ+mfGf2s8=uwADg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2011/12/19 Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>: > On 12/17/2011 04:00 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> >> I use it for checking of my most large plpgsql project - it is about >> 300KB plpgsql procedures - but this code is not free - and this module >> helps to find lot of bugs. > > > Great. If you continue to check against that regularly, that makes me feel > better. I was guessing you had a large body of such source code around, and > knowing it executed correctly against all of it improves my confidence here. > I am not alone a subset is used in plpgsql_lint and I know about some commercial subjects that use it too. https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_lint but code in check function is little newer. It can interesting test some code that is wroted by person with background from other db, because they use a different patterns I don't use a explicit cursors for example - on other hand, I use exception intensively in my last project. We can ask people from LedgerSMB about testing if somebody has contact Regards Pavel > > -- > Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD > PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: