Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRA+PJPgxM2G6C2aaT6AUFRN1_G33e0-U2_2qABxk0vJ-Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2015-07-17 6:26 GMT+02:00 Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>:
it is one possible solution too
multiple -c option has advantage of simple evaluation of backslash
statements .. -c "\l" -c "\dt" - but this advantage is not high important.
Or just properly understand the ; ?
-c "select * from foo; update bar set baz = 'bing'; vacuum bar;"
there is a risk of compatibility issues - all statements runs under one transaction implicitly
Pavel
JD
Pavel
Best Regards,
Dinesh
manojadinesh.blogspot.com <http://manojadinesh.blogspot.com>
Regards
Pavel
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: