Re: Relation extension scalability
| От | Dilip Kumar |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Relation extension scalability |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFiTN-vd-Yr-1TJei24qG2pa61TuRQj5MGaBUOjTnU=jMzKW_g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Relation extension scalability (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Relation extension scalability
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
FixedThanks for the comments..
Hmm, why did you remove the comment above the call to UnlockRelationForExtension?
While re factoring I lose this comment.. Fixed it
It still seems relevant, maybe with some minor modification?
Also there is a bit of whitespace mess inside the conditional lock block.
I got the result of 10 mins run so posting it..
Note: Base code results are copied from up thread...
Results For 10 Mins run of COPY 10000 records of size 4 bytes script and configuration are same as used in up thread
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Client Base Patch
1 105 111
2 217 246
4 210 428
8 166 653
16 145 808
32 124 988
64 --- 974
Results For 10 Mins run of INSERT 1000 records of size 1024 bytes(data don't fits in shared buffer)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Client Base Patch
1 117 120
2 111 126
4 51 130
8 43 147
16 40 209
32 --- 254
64 --- 205
--
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: