Re: Problem in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan?
От | Dilip Kumar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problem in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFiTN-uaFnn1Kh8yRko6YiTT-XY02s-jebETgo3vg7nEOsbF5w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Problem in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan? (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> I think in this area we need more testing, reason these are not tested >>> properly because these are not the natural case for parallel bitmap. >>> I think in next few days I will test more such cases by forcing the >>> parallel bitmap. >>> >> >> Okay, is your testing complete? Yes, I have done more testing around this area with more cases, like one page with BitmapOr etc. Now it looks fine to me. >> >>> Here is the patch to fix the issue in hand. I have also run the >>> regress suit with force_parallel_mode=regress and all the test are >>> passing. >>> >> >> Thomas, did you get chance to verify Dilip's latest patch? >> >> I have added this issue in PostgreSQL 10 Open Items list so that we >> don't loose track of this issue. > > The result is correct with this patch. I ran make installcheck then > the same steps as above and the query result was correct after > creating the index. Thanks for confirming. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: