Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum
От | Dilip Kumar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFiTN-uVc-avPfBBjkcz_FpaJXRSpN3fzUqGj3fR4DLmZxidvA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 7:22 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: > > On 16 October 2019 12:57:03 CEST, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:13 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> > >wrote: > >> All things > >> considered, I'm not sure which is better. > > > >Yeah, this is a tough call to make, but if we can allow it to delete > >the pages in bulkdelete conditionally for parallel vacuum workers, > >then it would be better. > > Yeah, if it's needed for parallel vacuum, maybe that tips the scale. Are we planning to do this only if it is called from parallel vacuum workers or in general? -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: