Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
От | Dilip Kumar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFiTN-uMp7V=oj23ZACUS--nKGdJLeGU+BsUqw3dtmeg0Bf+PA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 8:34 AM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote: > > + /* > + * If the relation is from the default tablespace then we need to > + * create it in the destinations db's default tablespace. Otherwise, > + * we need to create in the same tablespace as it is in the source > + * database. > + */ > > This comment looks a bit confusing to me especially because when we say destination db's default tablespace people maythink of pg_default tablespace (at least I think so). Basically what you are trying to say here - "If the relation existsin the same tablespace as the src database, then in the destination db also it should be the same or something likethat.. " So, why not put it that way instead of referring to it as the default tablespace. It's just my view. If youdisagree you can ignore it. > > -- > > + else if (src_dboid == dst_dboid) > + continue; > + else > + dstrnode.spcNode = srcrnode.spcNode;; > > There is an extra semicolon here. Noted. I will fix them in the next version. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: