Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
От | Dilip Kumar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFiTN-u0EJMEV8x4pcXYWNuR-tF9gnfV+Ne4_mVysjNnRXpQWA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 9:25 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 9:13 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On 2022-03-23 18:49:11 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote: > > > I think directly using smgrcreate() is a better idea instead of first > > > registering and then unregistering it. I have made that change in > > > the attached patch. After this change now we can merge creating the > > > MAIN_FORKNUM also in the loop below where we are creating other > > > fork[1] with one extra condition but I think current code is in more > > > sync with the other code where we are doing the similar things so I > > > have not merged it in the loop. Please let me know if you think > > > otherwise. > > > > FWIW, this fails tests: https://cirrus-ci.com/build/4929662173315072 > > https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6651773434724352?logs=test_bin#L121 > > https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6088823481303040?logs=test_world#L2377 > > Strange to see that these changes are making a failure in the > file_copy strategy[1] because we made changes only related to the > wal_log strategy. However I will look into this. Thanks. > [1] > Failed test 'createdb -T foobar2 foobar5 -S file_copy exit code 0' I could not see any reason for it to fail, and I could not reproduce it either. Is it possible to access the server log for this cfbot failure? -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: