Re: Logical Replication of sequences
| От | Dilip Kumar | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Logical Replication of sequences | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFiTN-u-PU-c1SGayzNnpJWz3HoF+rh5yJE33CNkiSGW4iXScg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: Logical Replication of sequences (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 12:30 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think the "ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub REFRESH PUBLICATION" command has > the word PUBLICATION in it because it's the PUBLICATION has changed > (stuff added/removed), so we need to refresh it. > > OTOH, the synchronisation of *existing* sequences is different - this > is more like the subscription saying "Just get me updated values for > the sequences I already know about". Therefore, I don't think the word > PUBLICATION is relevant here. > > ~~ > > So my suggestion is very different. Just this: > "ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub REFRESH SEQUENCES" > > I feel this is entirely consistent, because: > > PUBLICATION objects have changed. Refresh me the new objects => ALTER > SUBSCRIPTION sub REFRESH PUBLICATION; > > SEQUENCE values have changed. Refresh me the new values => ALTER > SUBSCRIPTION sub REFRESH SEQUENCES; I prefer this suggestion over the previous proposal so +1 from my side. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar Google
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: