Re: row filtering for logical replication
От | Dilip Kumar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFiTN-tbzSqYc7TkENqv6Scywvh2rEn+20U2XKpKDp7rWKgqgw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: row filtering for logical replication (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 7:37 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:55 PM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021, at 12:08 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > > > Yeah, but AFAIK that's needed only when replicating DELETEs, so perhaps > > we could ignore this for subscriptions without DELETE. > > > > ... and UPDATE. It seems we have a consensus to use old row in the row filter > > for UPDATEs. I think you meant publication. > > > > If I read correctly people are suggesting to use a new row for updates Right > but I still suggest completing the analysis (or at least spend some > more time) Tomas and I requested in the few emails above and then > conclude on this point. +1 -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: