Re: Logical Replication of sequences
| От | Dilip Kumar |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFiTN-tXpsLYtBfs8sEGuaUMav8xbS9D+8ARcdHnGDEfpWgdbw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | RE: Logical Replication of sequences ("Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 8:23 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
On Friday, October 24, 2025 11:22 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 16:47, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 11:45 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The attached patch has the changes for the same.
> > >
> >
> > I have pushed 0001 and the following are comments on 0002.
>
One question, I am not sure if this has been discussed before, So while getting sequence information from remote we are also getting the page_lsn of the sequence and we are storing that in pg_subscription_rel. Is it just for the user to see and compare whether the sequence is synced to the latest lsn or is it used for anything else as well? In our patch sert, I don't see much usability information about this field.
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
Google
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: