Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:39 PM John Naylor
<john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 1:17 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:00 PM John Naylor
> > <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Attached is a rebase to fix conflicts from recent commits.
> >
> > I have reviewed v22-0022* patch and I have some comments.
> >
> > 1.
> > >It also changes to the column names max_dead_tuples and num_dead_tuples and to
> > >show the progress information in bytes.
> >
> > I think this statement needs to be rephrased.
>
> Could you be more specific?

I mean the below statement in the commit message doesn't look
grammatically correct to me.

"It also changes to the column names max_dead_tuples and
num_dead_tuples and to show the progress information in bytes."

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com