Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
От | Dilip Kumar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFiTN-t8Yq3RgM1zO+xtDa6Qxms=OMV05Kq=1-xb4Xq3asuhTg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:17 AM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here are few more review comments: Thanks for reviewing it. > 1) It seems that we are not freeing the memory allocated for buf.data in CreateDirAndVersionFile(). Yeah this was a problem in v6 but I have fixed in v7, can you check that. > > + */ > +static void > +CreateDirAndVersionFile(char *dbpath, Oid dbid, Oid tsid, bool isRedo) > +{ > > 2) Do we need to pass dbpath here? I mean why not reconstruct it from dbid and tsid. Yeah we can do that but I thought computing dbpath has some cost and since the caller already has it why not to pass it. > > 3) Not sure if this point has already been discussed, Will we be able to recover the data when wal_level is set to minimalbecause the following condition would be false with this wal level. > > + use_wal = XLogIsNeeded() && > + (relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT || copying_initfork); > Since we are creating new relfilenode this is fine, refer "Skipping WAL for New RelFileNode" in src/backend/access/transam/README -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: