Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
От | Dilip Kumar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFiTN-sgQ-K9BnMWKLR7Hm36QNjS7ZOBF6hsXJmQz5ChC0Desw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 11:13 AM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, January 7, 2023 12:50 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 3:38 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Looks good, but I feel in pa_process_spooled_messages_if_required() > > function after getting the filestate the first check should be if (filestate== > > FS_EMPTY) return false. I mean why to process through all the states if it is > > empty and we can directly exit. It is not a big deal so if you prefer the way it is > > then I have no objection to it. > > I think your suggestion looks good, I have adjusted the code. > I also rebase the patch set due to the recent commit c6e1f6. > And here is the new version patch set. > LGTM -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: