Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
От | Dilip Kumar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is Recovery actually paused? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFiTN-sf5p2G6JJa2LmeHBv9v0j9=xMc4TkV=qVmU80T=_3Wdw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is Recovery actually paused? (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 3:52 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 12:28 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > --- > > + /* test for recovery pause if user has requested the pause */ > > + if (((volatile XLogCtlData *) XLogCtl)->recoveryPause) > > + recoveryPausesHere(false); > > + > > + now = GetCurrentTimestamp(); > > + > > > > Hmm, if the recovery pauses here, the wal receiver isn't launched even > > when wal_retrieve_retry_interval has passed, which seems not good. I > > think we want the recovery to be paused but want the wal receiver to > > continue receiving WAL. > > I had misunderstood the code and the patch, please ignore this > comment. Pausing the recovery here is fine with me. Thanks for the review Sawada-San, I will work on your other comments and post the patch. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: