Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dilip Kumar
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Дата
Msg-id CAFiTN-sTUfz_HgHWFBsgvPOYU+ZzMHbXd2j1f13U67kvhbVDRA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:07 PM, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I would suggest "non-zero positive", since that's what we are using in
>> the documentation.
>>
>
> Understood, Fixed in the attached version.

Why non-zero positive?  We do support zero for the remainder right?

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: