Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan
От | Dilip Kumar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFiTN-sCf9o3JuQhN9y7oFS2zWoDKQJ3vtxu0KDjPW8RSa9R5g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > It's not about speed. It's about not forgetting to prefetch. Suppose > that worker 1 becomes the prefetch worker but then doesn't return to > the Bitmap Heap Scan node for a long time because it's busy in some > other part of the plan tree. Now you just stop prefetching; that's > bad. You want prefetching to continue regardless of which workers are > busy doing what; as long as SOME worker is executing the parallel > bitmap heap scan, prefetching should continue as needed. Right, I missed this part. I will fix this. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: