Re: Enhanced error message to include hint messages for redundant options error
От | Dilip Kumar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Enhanced error message to include hint messages for redundant options error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFiTN-s9QPoeHU=eV3QWcEgXV3t-4cddw7ystH1Hut-pSOqSZg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Enhanced error message to include hint messages for redundant options error (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Enhanced error message to include hint messages for redundant options error
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 8:16 AM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:44 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > > > On 2021-Apr-29, vignesh C wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the comments, please find the attached v3 patch which has > > > the change for the first part. > > > > Looks good to me. I would only add parser_errposition() to the few > > error sites missing that. > > Yes, we need to add parser_errposition as agreed in [1]. > > I think we will have to make changes in compute_common_attribute as > well because the error in the duplicate_error goto statement is > actually for the duplicate option specified more than once, we can do > something like the attached. If it seems okay, it can be merged with > the main patch. + DefElem *duplicate_item = NULL; + if (strcmp(defel->defname, "volatility") == 0) { if (is_procedure) goto procedure_error; if (*volatility_item) - goto duplicate_error; + duplicate_item = defel; In this function, we already have the "defel" variable then I do not understand why you are using one extra variable and assigning defel to that? If the goal is to just improve the error message then you can simply use defel->defname? -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: