Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
От | Fabrízio de Royes Mello |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFcNs+qgR0LmVu8Y-jnQcZOxVeutTu_BOL-TKo-QJcZe0v4zGA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Yes unless many people object the commit.
> >>
> >> Michael,
> >> You're now modifying the patch?
> > Not within a couple of days.
>
> I think it's really too late for this for 9.4. At this point it's
> less than 48 hours until beta1 wraps, and we do not have the bandwidth
> to do anything but worry about stabilizing the features we've already
> got.
>
But it's a very small change with many benefits, and Michael acted very proactive to make this happens.
In a few hours I'll fix the last two suggestions (Fujii and Andres) and send it again.
Regards,
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: