Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
| От | Fabrízio de Royes Mello |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFcNs+qgB+OLrrkuMqwR0=Egfj1hyXNFKs2Qg5-MDrLNEkayRg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I don't even understand why it's questionable whether this should be
> > fixed.
>
> Sigh. We have some debate isomorphic to this one every year, it seems
> like. The argument why it shouldn't be fixed now is: ITS. TOO. LATE.
> Which part of that isn't clear to you?
>
Sorry but I don't understand why it's too late. The 9.4 branch not been created yet.
>
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I don't even understand why it's questionable whether this should be
> > fixed.
>
> Sigh. We have some debate isomorphic to this one every year, it seems
> like. The argument why it shouldn't be fixed now is: ITS. TOO. LATE.
> Which part of that isn't clear to you?
>
Sorry but I don't understand why it's too late. The 9.4 branch not been created yet.
And in the last hours various patches (mostly fixes) have been committed and IMO this is not different.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: