Re: Patch to .gitignore
От | Fabrízio de Royes Mello |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch to .gitignore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFcNs+qE57+W3R0Xm+sHDrUMyFO0jKAYH=61C2Ujcx5QRxB-Lw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch to .gitignore (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch to .gitignore
Re: Patch to .gitignore |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com> wrote:
There hasn't been general agreement on the merits of particular .gitignore rules of this sort.You could hide your own favorite patterns by putting this into your ~/.gitignore that isn't part of the repo, configuring this globally, thus:git config --global core.excludesfile '~/.gitignore'
Yes... I know that...
That has the consequence that you can hide whatever things your own tools like to create, and not worry about others' preferences.Us Emacs users can put things like *~, #*#, and such into our own "ignore" configuration; that doesn't need to bother you, and vice-versa for your vim-oriented patterns.
IMHO all output generated by tools inside the source tree that will not be committed must be added to .gitignore
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
Regards,
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: