Re: Failed to request an autovacuum work-item in silence
От | Fabrízio de Royes Mello |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Failed to request an autovacuum work-item in silence |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFcNs+qCaU8zeyNsx56gLLOSczpHCj-WHUHzZC_gogr85ywqiA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Failed to request an autovacuum work-item in silence (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Failed to request an autovacuum work-item in silence
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em ter, 23 de jan de 2018 às 03:36, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> escreveu:
Hi all,
While reading the code, I realized that the requesting an autovacuum
work-item could fail in silence if work-item array is full. So the
users cannot realize that work-item is never performed.
AutoVacuumRequestWork() seems to behave so from the initial
implementation but is there any reason of such behavior? It seems to
me that it can be a problem even now that there is only one kind of
work-item. Attached patch for fixing it.
Seems reasonable but maybe you can use the word "worker" instead of "work item" for report message.
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: