Re: [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED
От | Fabrízio de Royes Mello |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFcNs+q-ztKKHjFFgz=xdEmgArbpW=sC921izPYP7y0SR0KndA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:42 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> <fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Patch rebased and added to commitfest [1].
> It looks like a good thing to remove ATChangeIndexesPersistence, this
> puts the persistence switch directly into reindex process.
>
> A couple of minor comments about this patch:
> 1) Reading it, I am wondering if it would not be finally time to
> switch to a macro to get a relation's persistence, something like
> RelationGetPersistence in rel.h... Not related directly to this patch.
Good idea... I'll provide a patch soon.
> 2) reindex_index has as new argument a relpersislence value for the
> new index. reindex_relation has differently a new set of flags to
> enforce the relpersistence of all the underling indexes. Wouldn't it
> be better for API consistency to pass directly a relpersistence value
> through reindex_relation? In any case, the comment block of
> reindex_relation does not contain a description of the new flags.
I did it because the ReindexDatabase build a list of oids to run reindex_relation for each item of the list. I can change the list to store the relpersistence also, but this can lead us to a concurrency trouble because if one session execute REINDEX DATABASE and other session run "ALTER TABLE name SET {LOGGED|UNLOGGED}" during the building of the list the reindex can lead us to a inconsitence state.
Added comments to comment block of reindex_relation.
> 3) Here you may as well just set the value and be done:
> + /*
> + * Check if need to set the new relpersistence
> + */
> + if (iRel->rd_rel->relpersistence != relpersistence)
> + iRel->rd_rel->relpersistence = relpersistence;
Hmmm... I really don't know why I did it... fixed.
Thanks!
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: