Re: [HACKERS] Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE
Дата
Msg-id CAFcNs+prwNO+p+PO8kMFEuBSSAVRU4WXqg5r8zQDpgEfwjXs4Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения


On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/26/17 1:20 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> > Ok, but doing in that way the syntax would be:
> >
> > COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE IS 'comment';
>
> Yes, that's right.  We also have ALTER USER CURRENT_USER already.
>

Ok, but if we make CURRENT_DATABASE reserved wouldn't it lead us to a conflict with current_database() function?

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: